Nikkor 50mm f/1.2 AI. +
A Forgotten
Classic in the Digital Age
In the age
of smartphones, cameras are slowly losing their significance. Many people now
take photos with their smartphones, often without paying much attention to how
they are capturing the world. It’s all about the quantity of photos taken and
the message each photo conveys. This, of course, has its advantages.
One could
say that this approach to photography leans towards a more documentary style.
50mm 1.2 1/1000s 1.2 Iso 100 |
As an older
person fascinated by Nikon technology, I wanted to present and for some, remind
them of an old analog lens that is different from most lenses used by
photographers, regardless of their experience level.
Manual
lenses are not very popular these days, although there is a group of
enthusiasts, myself included, who use them to varying degrees. Manually
focusing is not something that helps in quickly capturing the moment. However,
after a few hundred shots, we start to get the hang of it, almost as if our
eyes and brain have developed a new ability to predict how to set the lens to
get a sharp image. We start doing this intuitively, as if we were one with the
camera. Old photographers probably chuckle to themselves, as they mastered this
skill in times when no one even thought of digital cameras. For those who
started with autofocus cameras, manually focusing seems like a waste of time.
The Nikon
Nikkor 50mm f/1.2 is one of those lenses that is iconic for a group of
enthusiasts. I don’t even know exactly why that is, as it’s not without its
flaws. Its shallow depth of field can be overwhelming when trying to photograph
moving subjects. Even those who are experienced and use manual lenses often
have to take a few shots before getting one that is perfectly sharp.
Some say
this lens is actually two lenses in one. At f/1.2, it’s primarily suited for
photographing stationary subjects or objects. However, when you stop the
aperture down to about f/2, the lens starts to behave almost like a normal
manual lens. The depth of field is large enough that it becomes easier to use
without stressing about it.
The
brightness of this lens was once what mattered most. In analog photography, we
didn’t have the luxury of changing the ISO to 6400 to shoot at night without a
tripod. Back then, the lens’s brightness was one of the key parameters.
So why use
this lens now, when its exceptional brightness is no longer as significant? Is
its bokeh so unique that it can’t be replicated in modern editing software?
That’s one
of those questions, similar to
“Why even
use lenses without autofocus?”
The answer
is not straightforward, and everyone has their own take on it.
My only
answer, which I will stand by, is the time we spend with ourselves. The moment
we dedicate to contemplating how the photo should look. Our process of
reviewing the image is only meant to confirm that the photo is exactly how we
envisioned it, rather than being surprised by the result.
Below are
two photographs that show the difference between an aperture of 1.2 and 5.6.
50mm 1.2 1/4000s 1:1.2 Iso 100-1LW |
Although the D610 camera I was using was set to ISO 100, the image taken at f/1.2 was too bright, so I had to reduce the ISO by 1 EV.
And here
are a few more photos I took on that sunny morning.
50mm 1.2 1/1000s 1:1.2 Iso 100
50mm 1.2 1/400s 1:1.2 Iso 100 |
50mm 1.2 1/800s 1:1.2 Iso 100 |
Comments
Post a Comment